Jeskai Ascendancy Combo at Grand Prix Houston

I didn't do much preparation for Grand Prix Houston. For local GPs in the past, I’ve brewed dozens of decks and tried many more I found online until I got the list I wanted to play. This time, real life time commitments got in the way. If you remember my New Year’s Resolution article, you may wonder why I stopped writing after resolving to put out one article a week. My wife and I have been in the process of buying a house, so that has taken up a lot of my free time. I don’t feel like I’ve failed at my resolution since I have been progressing on sorting my collection (an unwritten resolution I had) in preparation for moving.

With little time to prepare in my usual manner, I put my trust in my friends for this event. Will Lowry and I have assembled a group of players we know and trust in an online Slack group to help all involved build and tune decks for upcoming events. Will and I have worked together for just about every event either of us has played for about five years now, so I know he understands what I want from a deck. With him and others to do some of the more time consuming work, I was able to manage the discussion and have my issues addressed when I had the time.

The Deck

Collin Rountree showed me the first version of the deck we ended up playing (I somehow have several friends who want to play Jeskai Ascendancy Combo in every format, and he's in that group.). With the printing of Slip through Space and Expedite in Oath of the Gatewatch, there's finally enough critical mass of cantrips to enable a combo style of play. Also manlands and Elemental Uprising along with the Awaken mechanic create more ways to generate mana while the chain is going.

The first goal was to tune the deck to have the fastest goldfish (playing solitaire without an opponent) kill possible. After that, we played it against a variety of decks in the format to see if it was fast enough and how easy it was to disrupt. It turned out you could fairly reliably kill on turn 5, and the deck was more resilient to disruption that we thought. Also, much of the metagame including the deck-to-beat, Rally, didn’t have any good way to interact at all in game one!

When it was all said and done, we ended up playing this:

Standard
Jeskai Ascendancy Combo - Ty Thomason

Creatures (8) 4 Jace, Vryn's Prodigy 4 Rattleclaw Mystic Non-Creature Spells (30) 4 Treasure Cruise 4 Slip through Space 4 Expedite 4 Anticipate 1 Tormenting Voice 3 Radiant Flames 2 Briber's Purse 4 Elemental Uprising 4 Jeskai Ascendancy

Lands (22) 2 Plains 2 Island 2 Mountain 1 Prairie Stream 1 Cinder Glade 1 Canopy Vista 1 Wooded Foothills 4 Frontier Bivouac 4 Flooded Strand 4 Windswept Heath Sideboard (15) 3 Monastery Mentor 3 Dispel 3 Valorous Stance 2 Disdainful Stroke 2 Reclaim 2 Kozilek's Return

The Process

Step 1: Get Jeskai Ascendancy in play.
Step 2: Have an active Rattleclaw Mystic or cast Elemental Uprising.
Step 3: Cast cards like Slip through Space and Expedite to grow your creatures and untapping them at the same time, making the cards “free”.
Step 4: Use the loot ability of Ascendancy to keep the chain going, and use Treasure Cruise to keep your hand full.
Step 5: Repeat this process until your creatures are big enough to kill your opponent. Then attack with unblockable 20/20s!

Getting two creatures that add mana is important, especially if you aren’t comboing with Bivouac or Rattleclaw as you’ll probably need a red and a blue source. Eventually you can net mana, and add even more creatures to the board if needed. Expedite can turn on Jace to flashback key spells as you are comboing. Briber's Purse can add mana when you need it, or it can help clear the way if you don’t find Slip.

The Choices

You can build a three color only version with Awaken spells and Wall of Resurgence, but it isn’t nearly as fast as adding green. Rattleclaw lets you go off on turn three sometimes (not very often and usually not necessary). Elemental Uprising is both a creature and a way to trigger Ascendancy. Both are the cheapest options, especially compared with manlands. And you only need eight total in the deck. The mana is good, but not great. It might still need a second Cinder Glade instead of a Mountain. Frontier Bivouac is your best land, and the best target for Elemental Uprising.

The main deck Radiant Flames buys you a bunch of time, especially against decks like Bant Collected Company and Four Color Rally. They also can be used when comboing to clear the way for your attackers.

Dig Through Time proved to be worse than Treasure Cruise, and you can only have so many Delve spells. With Jace in the deck, you can cast more than four Cruises while going off if you really need to. Dig is only better in the situations when you're looking for Ascendancy, and it's still difficult to cast. You could maybe replace the Tormenting Voice with one Dig.

The sideboard has more interaction for when Radiant Flames and Briber's Purse aren’t needed. Monastery Mentor isn't as good as it looks, but still earns a spot because of the surprise factor.

The Tournament

In total, seven of us played the deck at GP Houston. Six of us made the second day, though most did at just 6-3. Robert Berni got to show it off in a few feature matches. A few who made day two at 6-3 declined on playing the second day, but three of us continued on. In the end, only Tony Ho and I stuck it out to the end, finishing right next to each other in the standings at 9-6.

I played against Abzan variants way more often than expected, including five out of six on day two. Abzan has historically been good against these kinds of combo decks by being able to play efficient green and white beaters while disrupting you with discard and removal. I think four of my losses were to Abzan, but two of them was more because my deck failed me. It’s probably not a favorable matchup.

The Aftermath

Perhaps we misjudged the metagame, expecting more Rally than I ran into. Perhaps I should've just played Rally instead; it worked out for Haibing Hu despite his lack of preparation. But given the lack of time I had, I don’t feel too disappointed in my finish. I still made day two (at 6-3), but it's only the second time I’ve made day two without winning money. I think it was a good first run for our group process, and I look forward to working with the guys in the future.

Thanks,
Ty

Revisiting Pack Rat in Legacy

Towards the end of Pack Rat’s domination of Standard, many players began to experiment with the once over-looked card in other formats. Tad Macaraeg and others had some success with it in the Modern format, but I went one step further and attempted to bring it to Legacy.

my apologies to everyone who likes legacy pic.twitter.com/cLJIo4boeF

— Ty Thomason (@ceciliajupe) August 21, 2014

We all quickly discovered that Pack Rat was not the force to be reckoned with that it was in Standard. While our attempts may have been more to frustrate opponents who were tired of losing to the Rat round after round, I learned quite a bit from the process. Today, I’ll be going over some of the things I learned as well as presenting one of the more recent experimentations.
Why play Pack Rat?
One of my favorite concepts in deck building is the idea of different Axes of Attack. The best example is Standard-era CawBlade. The deck could beat you by using Stoneforge Mystic to find Batterskull or various swords. It could also beat you just by playing a bunch of Squadron Hawks and protecting them with countermagic. Or it could beat you by acting as a control deck centered on Jace, the Mind Sculptor. Having three different plans allowed the deck to take the best role for the matchup, and it also made it very resilient to the opponent’s actions. Diversifying your threats makes it much harder for your opponent to negate your plan with sideboard cards.
Pack Rat as a threat is not the fastest, most disruptive, most resilient, or hardest to answer. But it does present a unique challenge for opponents to answer. Relying on 1-for-1 spot removal to answer creatures like Delver of Secrets or Dark Confidant won’t be as effective. Graveyard hate, like Rest in Peace creating Virtual Card Advantage against threats like Deathrite Shaman and Tarmogoyf, won’t stop Pack Rat. By using Pack Rat in conjunction with a diverse set of threats, you add an Axis of Attack to your deck that could be useful.
What are the drawbacks of Pack Rat?
Pack Rat is slow by Legacy standards. Without Mutavault, the clock it presents is slightly slower than a fully powered up Tarmogoyf. It also requires a huge commitment of resources every turn. Pack Rat is also black. I think black is one of the worst colors in Legacy, maybe even the stone worst. Pinpoint discard like Thoughtseize is not as good in a format where Brainstorm is the most played card. Also, the power level of decks is so high that opponents are much more likely to topdeck something good. Liliana is expensive in a format with Daze and Wasteland.
Cards to Play with Pack Rat
While Thoughtseize may be the best set up card for Pack Rat in Standard and Modern, I don’t think it's necessarily needed in Legacy. Since we're using Pack Rat to supplement other threats, we can use those threats to act as disruption, drawing out the removal that would normally go towards Pack Rat. Once both players are out of gas, Pack Rat can come down and take over the game. Discard might still be wanted to disrupt the lightning quick combo decks of the format, but it shouldn’t be relied upon to set up the horde.
Dark Confidant is Pack Rat’s best friend. He shares a color and provides the additional cards to create more rats. He also acts as a lightning rod for removal. Liliana is also very good with Pack Rat. You can use her +1 ability after discarding to Pack Rat every turn, so you will gain Card Advantage.
Cards that can be used from the graveyard also have synergy with Pack Rat. Lingering Souls, Punishing Fire, and Life from the Loam are all great compliments to Pack Rat. It’s important to remember that Pack Rat itself is a compliment to other strategies, so loading your deck full of these will just slow down your deck past the point of playability.
Mutavault is always a card to consider, but Legacy really emphasizes the need for colored mana sources with the prevalence of Wasteland. Mutavault could be right if you want to play a large number of lands (22+).
Some Pack Rat Brews

Legacy
BG Pack Rat - Ty Thomason

Creatures (16) 4 Deathrite Shaman 4 Tarmogoyf 4 Dark Confidant 4 Pack Rat Non-Creature Spells (22)2 Sylvan Library 3 Liliana of the Veil 4 Hymn to Tourach 4 Abrupt Decay 4 Thoughtseize 1 Maelstrom Pulse 2 Life from the Loam 1 Disfigure 1 Umezawa's Jitte

Lands (22) 4 Wasteland 4 Bayou 4 Verdant Catacombs 3 Swamp 1 Forest 4 Bloodstained Mire 1 Treetop Village 1 Urborg, Tomb of Yawgmoth Sideboard (15) ???

This was my first Pack Rat brew. It's based on Modern Jund and other BGx decks but really playing up the disruption and aggressiveness. It looks like it shares a lot of cards with recent BUG Delver lists, and Pack Rat might just be a worse Delver of Secrets. This would be the best deck to try Mutavault in.

Legacy
BW Pack Rat - Ty Thomason

Creatures (16) 4 Deathrite Shaman4 Stoneforge Mystic 4 Dark Confidant4 Pack Rat Non-Creature Spells (22)3 Lingering Souls 1 Batterskull 1 Umezawa's Jitte1 Sword of Fire and Ice4 Thoughtseize3 Liliana of the Veil4 Swords to Plowshares4 Hymn to Tourach1 Vindicate

Lands (22) 4 Wasteland 4 Verdant Catacombs 4 Marsh Flats 2 Windswept Heath 1 Bayou 4 Scrubland 1 Swamp 1 Plains 1 Savannah Sideboard (15) ???

I love Stoneforge Mystic, but she isn’t the best with Pack Rat. Abrupt Decay versus Swords to Plowshares is an interesting swap and depends on the metagame you expect. There are probably better Abzan lists and definitely better Stoneforge lists.

Legacy
Shardless BUG Rat - Ty Thomason

Creatures (16) 4 Deathrite Shaman3 Tarmogoyf4 Shardless Agent4 Pack Rat1 Tasigur, the Golden Fang Non-Creature Spells (21)2 Jace, the Mind Sculptor 2 Liliana of the Veil4 Ancestral Vision4 Brainstorm4 Abrupt Decay2 Hymn to Tourach2 Thoughtseize1 Life from the Loam

Lands (23) 4 Wasteland 1 Creeping Tar Pit 4 Polluted Delta 4 Verdant Catacombs 2 Misty Rainforest 2 Bayou 2 Tropical Island 4 Underground Sea Sideboard (15) ???

Drawing lots of cards with Ancestral Visions and Jace is a good way to fuel Pack Rat. Without Force of Will (not enough blue cards plus non-bo with Pack Rat), you might need more disruption cards. I haven’t played enough with this to know if it’s good or not. Shardless BUG probably doesn’t need more ways to win the long, grindy games.

Legacy
Chalice Jund - Ty Thomason

Creatures (12) 4 Tarmogoyf4 Dark Confidant4 Pack Rat Non-Creature Spells (24)4 Chalice of the Void 3 Life from the Loam3 Liliana of the Veil2 Sylvan Library4 Abrupt Decay4 Punishing Fire4 Mox Diamond

Lands (24) 1 Barren Moor 1 Tranquil Thicket 1 Forest 1 Swamp 1 Badlands 2 Bayou 2 Bloodstained Mire 4 Grove of the Burnwillows 1 Taiga 4 Verdant Catacombs 4 Wasteland 2 Wooded Foothills Sideboard (15) ???

This is the latest brew I have. I based it off of the Punishing Abzan lists that have done well lately. The manabase is more forgiving since it’s only three colors. Tarmogoyf is actually great in these decks, but Pack Rat is not as good as Knight of the Reliquary. Not having access to Gaddock Teeg is also a negative. This deck can still be a force in the metagame because Chalice of the Void is that strong. Pack Rat and Life from the Loam are good together, but Dark Depths and Thespian's Stage might be better uses of Loam. This is somewhere between Jund and Lands, and I’m not sure it needs to exist. It's fun if you like making rats every turn. The list might need a Volrath’s Stronghold, probably as a 25th land.
So…Now what?

So maybe Pack Rat won’t ever change the Legacy landscape. But it’s still a uniquely powerful card to keep in mind when building a deck. And if you really love making rats, it's not so bad to hurt your deck significantly. Perhaps focusing on it less can increase its success. Adding in one or two to an existing deck won’t hurt the consistency and will add a new dimension. Maybe you'll be the one to find the perfect home for the card in Legacy. Good luck brewing!
Thanks,
Ty

Basics of Magic Theory

In the upcoming year of writing once a week, I may try to discuss some theoretical aspects of the game. Magic theory has always been of interest to me and I think taking a serious academic approach to some concepts can be beneficial to a player. Some of my favorite articles that I’ve read over the years have been theory articles.

My goal is not to develop a universal theory that relates everything because I think the best way to talk about theory is to keep it applicable. A good understanding of theory can help in three ways: 1) A better understanding of the game situation and what's important 2) A way to differentiate between possible decisions and outcomes 3) A way to evaluate cards from new sets for use in various formats.

In this article I want to define some of the basic concepts of theory so that in my future writing they can be used as a reference to understand exactly what I’m talking about. This list is not comprehensive or exhaustive. One day I may expand it and add references when necessary. But for the purposes of this site, brevity wins out. I'll assume you know most of the rules of the game and have a decent enough grasp on basic strategy. I shouldn't need to explain what chump blocking is, why it’s bad to do on turn three, or why other similarly awful things are bad.

Resources, Their Limiting Factors, and the Big Three Concepts

Magic is a game of resources, but it’s much more than a game of resource management. There are three major resources in the game: cards, mana, and life. Each of these resources is limited by one or more rules. You only draw one card a turn and can't have more than seven in hand at the end of a turn. You can only play one land a turn. You start with only twenty life points. These three resources and their limiting factors are integral to the big three theoretical concepts: Card Advantage, Philosophy of Fire, and Tempo. There are other limitations in the game, chiefly getting only one attack and untap step each turn. These will be discussed when appropriate. I define the big three concepts as the exchange of resources for an increase in a certain type of resource.

Card Advantage

This is the exchange of resources (cards, mana, life) for cards.

If all cards are equal, the person with the most card advantage will win. The simplest illustration is two decks full of Memnites playing against each other. If a player is allowed to draw even one more card than the other, that card will be the deciding factor of the game*. The way I define a card for CA analysis includes creatures on the battlefield, including tokens even though they aren’t technically cards per the comprehensive rules. Permanents on the battlefield that can’t attack or block generally don't count as cards.

*This is actually only true if the player drawing the extra card is on the draw. The player on the play would be required to draw two additional cards to tip the scales in his or her favor, or the creatures would need haste. This is a good illustration for the difference between being on the play versus being on the draw.

The exchange of resources (cards, life, mana) for life (either yours or your opponents).

This concept was originally put forward by Michael Flores in his article by the same name. I don’t like the name, but I like the concept (the opposite will be true for tempo). I’ve expanded on the main points of his article to apply to more than just Burn decks. A good illustration is a deck full of Lightning Bolts and Mountains. Drawing seven Bolts is all that is needed to win the game. Any Bolt spent not killing your opponent is one more you need to draw down the road to finish him or her off. Some decks immediately start with a philosophy of fire mindset, trying to convert resources to damage right away. Others wait until the game is firmly in control before using the resource advantage to end the game. Using cards to gain life is also part of the philosophy of fire. For each Healing Salve your opponent plays, you'll need to draw an additional Lightning Bolt. Philosophy of fire also covers situations where you attack with a greater number of creatures than your opponent has as blockers. You lose one or more attackers in the process, but gain from the damage dealt by your unblocked creatures. You traded resources (cards / creatures in play) for life (damage to the opponent).

Tempo

The exchange of resources (cards, life, mana) for mana.

This is perhaps an oversimplification of a very complex subject, but talking about tempo can be difficult at times. Some commonly held ideas about tempo can be described in terms of card advantage and philosophy of fire. Only by clearly defining those other two, can we see the negative space left as it’s own independent concept. Tempo is a great name. But historically, it has been poorly defined. I won’t try to convince you that my definition is correct, but it'll be the definition I use in future articles. My concept of tempo only works because the mana system works the way it does. Cards increase in power level as their mana cost increases, and you can only play one land a turn (lands being the primary source for mana). Note that playing a land is a tempo play: it costs a resource (card from hand) and since the land does not attack or block, it no longer counts as a card. The word tempo implies a time-dependent quality, usually described as a turn. Missing a land drop can cost tempo. Not making a play on a critical turn (failing to utilize mana you have available) is also negative tempo. Being behind one or more turns in a game can lead to a swift defeat. The other restrictions mentioned above (only one untap, only one attack) also apply to tempo in some situations.

Additional Concepts

Velocity

The amount of cards you see in a game.

If card advantage is important when all cards are equal, velocity is important for finding a specific card that is much better than the rest. Cards like Preordain, Ponder, and Serum Visions create velocity without a loss of card advantage. Traditionally, a card that sees more cards but doesn’t replace itself (i.e. Index) wouldn’t count as Velocity since it doesn’t quantitatively get you further into your deck. I think Index should still count, but understand that velocity is not generally worth a card. Note that card-drawing spells like Divination create both card advantage and velocity. A card that creates only card advantage would be something like Entreat the Angels.

Threat Density

The amount of relevant cards left in your deck.

Velocity explored the idea that not all cards are equal. Threat density takes this further by acknowledging that in the later stages of the game, many cards are no longer useful. Lands are almost always useless after a certain point. When this point is reached, having more spells than lands left in your deck than your opponent means you'll be less likely to experience mana flooding. Threat density is very important for aggressive decks, and one of the biggest reasons to play aggressive decks is their low land count.

Card advantage “created” by neutralizing your opponents cards without actually destroying or discarding them.

Don't confuse virtual card advantage with threat density. Sometimes people use the term to refer to creation of tokens, but this is confusing and I think my system allows for tokens to be pure card advantage in a way that works. Virtual card advantage can be created by cards like Chalice of the Void, or Moat, or Rest in Peace against a deck with Tarmogoyfs. Usually they're permanent-based.

Some Good Articles to Read

1. Stage-Skipping Standard

Stages describe what part of the game you are in.

This is a great concept from Mike Flores. I quote his explanations because they really are great.

Stage 1 - “In Stage I you are basically mana screwed.”
Stage 3 - “In Stage III one player is both 1) dictating the field of battle and 2) playing in such a way that only a subset of the opponent's cards (if any) are live any more.”
Stage 2 - “Stage II is...everything else.”

If you want to know more, click on the link to the article. It’s a very good concept that hasn’t really entered into common theory discussion, and I don’t see a need to put it in my own words.

2. Who's the Beatdown?

This describes the roll you take in a matchup.

Yet another Mike Flores creation. It can’t be overstated how much great stuff Flores has contributed to Magic theory over the years. In my opinion, he's the best writer of all time, but I’m kind of a geek for the theory stuff.

3. Chatter of the Squirrel - What Matters

Focus on what matters. Enough said.

Strategy, Tactics, and Operations

Flores put forth these three terms here, but the definitions have shifted over the years. Thus, my definitions are presented here.

Tactics

These are the choices you make in a single turn to maximize the effectiveness of the turn. Tactics can occasionally be expanded to beyond a single turn, but it's the nuts and bolts of solid Magic play. You can be very successful in Magic just by using good tactics. I won my first PTQ in Limited by relying on tactics and some good instinct, but really not on any in depth strategy (I also got pretty lucky).

Strategy

This is broader than tactics. It's knowing what's important in a match-up, as well has how to sideboard. Deck construction can also be considered a part of strategy.

Operations

This is stuff outside the game that you use, some parts of it more impactful than others. Playing all matching basic lands in your deck is part of operations. Scouting in the late rounds of a tournament is operations. Shuffling the card you draw into your hand is part of operations. Some of it can border on the fringes of ethical and legal play, so be careful! My favorite Magic quote has to deal with operations: “Your ability to succeed at the top levels of Magic is directly related to your ability to control your tells.” - Gary Wise (I promise I won’t quote this every article!)

Looking Ahead

Hopefully this gives you enough foundation and background that I can communicate effectively going forward. I know I’m working on something to dive more in depth to my ideas about tempo. In the meantime, I’ve been drafting Mirrodin on Magic Online. Follow me on Twitter to find out when I’m streaming!

Thanks,
Ty

2016 Magic Resolutions

Last year wasn't a great year for me in the world of Magic. It was a great year for me in everything else - I finished school, I got married, I moved to College Station (this might not be that great), and I got a new job. All of these things took time away from my favorite game (picking up a nasty Hearthstone habit didn’t help either).

In the few major events I played, I didn't perform up to my standards. I played slower than usual because I was reacting to new situations I should've seen in testing. My mental game was weak as I failed to take advantage of some reads I had and probably gave away more information than I gained. I tilted a couple of times because I valued the specific result higher than normal since I was playing fewer tournaments.

So at the end of 2015, I did some self evaluation and came up with a plan to improve in some areas. It’s going to be a New Year’s resolution of sorts. The overall goal isn’t any one thing. I don’t aspire to make it back to the Pro Tour. But if it happens as a result of the process, I’m more than willing to face that challenge again. However, goals without measurable outcomes are difficult to actually meet so I try to keep things quantifiable. I have three categories of resolution: Content Creation, Tournaments, and the more abstract Play Improvements.

Content Creation

Content creation will be the biggest part of my plan for 2016. I want to write an article at least once a week. I’ve written articles in the past and have tried to keep up a tournament report blog, but I always lacked in motivation. My goal with writing every week is to find out what I like to write about, which might actually be different than what I want to write about since writing what I want hasn’t worked out before. I’m going to try many different types of articles as the year goes on. If there's anything you want to see me to write about, send the suggestions my way.

I may also try to record a video periodically if I can figure out how to do it. A perfect way to meet my goals for drafting (see below) will be to record the drafts I do. If this is successful, it may take the place of some articles to afford me some more free time. Streaming is also a possibility.

Tournaments

I want to do at least one booster draft a week. When I lived in Houston, our group would meet regularly for one to three drafts during the week. I haven’t been able to replicate this where I am now, so I will have to use Magic Online. I prefer to play constructed on MTGO, but my Limited game is suffering. I’ve only drafted BFZ one time!

I plan to attend every Grand Prix in the area. I also plan to attend any SCG Opens that come this way. Traveling for tournaments won’t be a high priority, but I want the play experience that comes with it so I'll make a goal of traveling to two large events. This may include Vintage and Legacy Champs as they have been on my bucket list for some time.

As for PPTQs, I won’t be playing many. I’m not a fan of the system in general, and I really don’t want to drive more than an hour to play in them. When they come up and it makes sense, I'll go. But since the goal isn’t necessarily to qualify for the PT, it won’t be a high priority like the other resolutions.

Play Improvements

These are all more abstract than the others, and thus harder to measure. They'll be evaluated at the end of the year mostly by feel. I'll also look at how well I kept to the related goals above and how well they allowed me to accomplish what I wanted.

I want to improve my Limited skills. At one point, I was probably in the top five drafters in Texas, but I’ve clearly let it lapse. Even when I was at the top of my Limited game, I still relied on instinct combined with opinions from players I respected. I rarely experimented in Draft to find new strategies or to see where I may have been off with some evaluations. Hopefully by drafting once a week I can regain my old form and learn some new tricks.

I want to regain control of my body language and tells. My favorite quote about Magic comes from Gary Wise, “Your ability to succeed at the top levels of Magic is directly related to your ability to control your tells.” I’m definitely rusty at this, and maybe there's some paranoia and I haven’t actually lost as much as I think. But it’s still a goal of mine, and the best way to get better is practice. I want to play a minimum number of IRL tournaments to work on these skills, hopefully at least once a month.

Looking Forward

I'm intentionally keeping a lot of the plan open-ended. I’ll play the formats I’m interested in playing. I won’t force Modern or Standard when I don’t want to play. Other than drafting once a week, I won’t have any commitments. I want to use my play time as research for weekly articles. This is where I can use suggestions from the readers. Let me know if there's something you want me to write about or somewhere you want me to play, and I’ll see what I can do. I’m looking forward to sharing this year’s journey with you.

Thanks,
Ty

Legacy 1K and Miracles thoughts

I played the Pat’s Games Legacy 1k on Sundayin Austin. I really appreciate Pat running big tournaments to support both Legacy and Modern that are worth making the trip to. I wish more stores would have cash prize tournaments.

The Deck

I played Cavern Miracles in the event. Here is my list:

4 Sensei's Divining Top

4 Counterbalance

4 Brainstorm

4 Force of Will

4 Swords to Plowshares

4 Terminus

2 Counterspell

4 Jace the Mind Sculptor

2 Spell Pierce

2 Monastery Mentor

1 Snapcaster Mage

2 Venser, Shaper Savant

4 Tundra

4 Flooded Strand

1 Arid Mesa

4 Scalding Tarn

5 Island

1 Plains

2 Cavern of Souls

2 Karakas

Sideboard

3 Containment Priest

2 Rest in Peace

2 Flusterstorm

3 Vendilion Clique

2 Disenchant

1 Teferi, Mage of Zhalfir

1 Monastery Mentor

1 Misdirection

A lot of thoughts went into this list, some good and some bad.

Monastery Mentor over Entreat the Angels - I liked only having to play 1 basic Plains, it made fetching the basics easier than some other versions, but Mentor was not as reliable of a kill condition. In theory it’s better in the mirror with Cavern and can kill quicker on 4-5 lands. I did not play against the mirror, so I can’t speak for that, but I did not play enough Mentors to reliably close out the games I was ahead in. It still might be good, I’m not sure though. The way my deck was constructed I think Entreat might have been better.

I never like playing red cards in Miracles, and I did not miss them at all. Blood Moon has never worked out for me. Spell Pierce and Flusterstorm have been acceptable replacements for Pyroblast. Wear / Tear is better than Disenchant, but I consider it a luxury when you consider the mana base tradeoffs. Izzet Staticaster is better now that Mentor is on the rise, and is the only card without a good replacement.

I always play 4 Jace in Miracles. I like to play the game in the Jace direction, and still haven’t seen a good reason not to. I think this list should have had 3 Cliques main instead of Mentors, but I wouldn’t cut a Jace for the 3rd. Maybe the Snapcaster.

The 2 Karakas might be overkill. I wanted 23 land because Ponder was awful when I played it. Riptide Lab is probably too expensive, and Karakas is better versus Gaddock Teeg and Reanimator.

The sideboard had all the cards I wanted, none of the cards I didn’t want. I never felt like I was missing something. Sometimes I thought I had too much to bring in. I brought in Cliques almost every match. Reanimator was very easy with so much hate. I never got to cast Teferi but was not upset to have access to him in several matches.


The Tournament

My first round opponent had preregistered but did not show up. The final count was 67 players, but 3 no shows. We could have had a six round tournament if there had only been a players meeting before pairings. The time saved by skipping the meeting did not make up for the extra round. That was my only complaint for how the tournament was run.
1-0

Round 2 I played against Grixis Delver. His deck didn’t do anything. He never had Stifle or Daze when I thought he would. He never had Therapy to go with his Probes. He occasionally had Force of Will, but never used it on the important spells. He might not have been experience in Legacy.
2-0

Round 3 I play against Robert Berni. Half the reason I went up for the tournament was to hang out with him since I hadn’t seen him since his return from the Phillipines. He was on Shardless Bug. Game 1 was a grind, I was almost able to defeat three Liliana ultimates, but eventually he got me. Game 2 I had Jace in play versus his Liliana. I played Mentor and Top to pressure his planeswalker, but he had his own Jace to take out my creatures. I never beat this deck when they have their own Jace.
2-1

Round 4 I play against Tad Macareg and his RUG Delver. Game 1 I have plenty of lands, he doesn’t have an early threat, and I lock up the game with Counterbalance. He concedes to 1 and 2 on top of my deck. Game 2 I mulligan and get Stifle-Wastelanded out of the game. Game 3 I keep a sketch one land Top hand with 2 Force of Wills. I eventually draw out of it, and his double mulligan allows my Forces to buy me the time I need, but I never find Terminus and his 3 Nimble Mongoose kill me.
2-2

Round 5 I play against Reanimator. Game 1 he spends early turns Pondering and Brainstorming. I counter his first Exhume for Griselbrand. I play Karakas as my 5th land. He has a second Exhume and goes for it. I Snapcaster Counterspell, he Dazes, I pay, he Dazes again. He then draws 7 cards and Entombs Grave Titan. I bounce the Griselbrand on my turn and attack. Venser with Cavern and Karakas keep him from ever getting Grave Titan into play while I finish him off with some attacks. Game 2 I have Containment Priest, Flusterstorm, and Rest in Peace and am never in a bad position since he fails to draw any discard.
3-2

Round 6 I play against Aluren. I had never played against it before, and was excited to see something new. Both games were very close, I was able to resolve Jace, but I may have misplayed it. He was able to Deathrite Shaman me game 1 with Aluren and I couldn’t bounce it to stay alive. Game 2 was very similar, he couldn’t combo me because I had countered Cavern Harpy earlier in the game, but eventually he played 3 Imperial Recruiters to beat me down and I couldn’t answer all of them with Venser before I died.
3-3

Round 7 I play against Jund. Game 1 I’m on the play, counter his first Liliana, and play Jace to bounce his Tarmogoyf. He doesn’t have Bloodbraid or Bolt, so I untap and take over with Jace. Game 2 i’m on the back foot the entire time after his turn two Liliana and turn three Bloodbraid into Goblin Rabblemaster. Game 3 I play Mentor on turn 3, he has Abrupt Decay but I Misdirect it to his Deathrite Shaman. He has another Decay but is out of gas at this point. I draw Jace while he draws lands so I win.
4-3

22nd place.


The Takeaway

I’m definitely still rusty, I felt like I was reacting too often to what my opponents were doing instead of seeing it before it happened. That’s not a good place to be with a deck like this. Hopefully I can play more frequently and have more preparation for whatever my next tournament is. I think the deck wasn’t focused on the things I wanted it to be.